top of page
Articles
Filter By:


Brief on Palliative Care to the Health Committee
In this five-page submission (download PDF) to the House of Commons standing committee on health, the EFC recommends: a continued focus on compassionate, life-affirming care that maintains the distinction between palliative care and euthanasia/medical assistance in dying. support for palliative care providers and hospices, include strong, clear conscience protection for individuals and institutions increased training for health care providers in palliative care across all set
May 4, 20201 min read
![Lamb v. Canada [2019]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_006114f7cddc41418ed49c93191a2fbb~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_445,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_006114f7cddc41418ed49c93191a2fbb~mv2.webp)
![Lamb v. Canada [2019]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_006114f7cddc41418ed49c93191a2fbb~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_306,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_006114f7cddc41418ed49c93191a2fbb~mv2.webp)
Lamb v. Canada [2019]
The EFC was granted intervener status in the Lamb case in B.C., which involved attempts to expand access to assisted suicide and euthanasia. The case would have been argued before the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The EFC was intervening with the Christian Legal Fellowship. However, the Lamb case was adjourned in September 2019 because Julia Lamb has been approved for MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying). EFC-CLF Notice of Application to Intervene (Dec. 7, 2018) BC Civil L
Feb 5, 20191 min read
![CMDS et al v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario [2017-2019]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_779a31d0d30f4075906f73673ad0b019~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_443,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_779a31d0d30f4075906f73673ad0b019~mv2.webp)
![CMDS et al v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario [2017-2019]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_779a31d0d30f4075906f73673ad0b019~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_305,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_779a31d0d30f4075906f73673ad0b019~mv2.webp)
CMDS et al v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario [2017-2019]
The Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision May 15, 2019 in the forced referrals case, an appeal of the legal challenge to the Ontario requirement that doctors provide effective referrals for procedures they object to on grounds of conscience, such as euthanasia and assisted suicide. NEW! In fall 2019, the doctors and organizations who brought forward the legal challenge decided not to appeal the decision of the Ontario Appeal Court to protect against the potential of a
Jan 23, 20193 min read
![P.T. et al v. Alberta [2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_4e17bd4366fc443cbcd0dc40b58618eb~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_443,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_4e17bd4366fc443cbcd0dc40b58618eb~mv2.webp)
![P.T. et al v. Alberta [2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_4e17bd4366fc443cbcd0dc40b58618eb~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_305,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_4e17bd4366fc443cbcd0dc40b58618eb~mv2.webp)
P.T. et al v. Alberta [2018]
Alberta passed Bill 24: An Act to Support Gay-Straight Alliances, in November 2017. The bill required school principals to immediately grant permission for Gay-Straight Alliance/Queer-Straight Alliance clubs or activities “intended to promote a welcoming, caring, respectful and safe learning environment that respects diversity and fosters a sense of belonging” at the request of a student. However the province has passed new legislation that does not include the provisions fro
Nov 5, 20182 min read
![Trinity Western University School of Law [2013-2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_a89daafd683c42ef933738fe120c9879~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_445,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_a89daafd683c42ef933738fe120c9879~mv2.webp)
![Trinity Western University School of Law [2013-2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_a89daafd683c42ef933738fe120c9879~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_306,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_a89daafd683c42ef933738fe120c9879~mv2.webp)
Trinity Western University School of Law [2013-2018]
Here's the latest news including implications analysis by lawyer Geoffrey Trotter, podcast with TWU’s Bob Kuhn, EFC president’s blog and video, webinar discussion, news releases and more. Below this bulleted list is a series of buttons that allow viewing of additional material. Implications for the Evangelical Community of the Supreme Court Decision in the Trinity Western University Law School Case. By Geoffrey Trotter, co-counsel for the EFC in its interventions in the TWU l
Jun 14, 20187 min read
![Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia [2016-2017]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_fc3ec5d1ebae43afb563ca8794b61b50~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_443,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_fc3ec5d1ebae43afb563ca8794b61b50~mv2.webp)
![Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia [2016-2017]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_fc3ec5d1ebae43afb563ca8794b61b50~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_305,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_fc3ec5d1ebae43afb563ca8794b61b50~mv2.webp)
Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia [2016-2017]
On Nov. 2, 2017, justices at the Supreme Court announced their decision in the Ktunaxa case, which they heard back on Dec. 1, 2016. The EFC intervened in the case, and here you’ll find an issue summary, analysis and links to media releases and legal arguments. Issue Summary (From 2016) For the first time, the Supreme Court of Canada was set to determine the merits of an Indigenous religious freedom claim under the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. This historic c
Nov 2, 20174 min read
![Wall v. Judicial Committee of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses [2017-2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_46aaf0f232c6466fa74216ef7184d3ce~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_443,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_46aaf0f232c6466fa74216ef7184d3ce~mv2.webp)
![Wall v. Judicial Committee of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses [2017-2018]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_46aaf0f232c6466fa74216ef7184d3ce~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_305,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_46aaf0f232c6466fa74216ef7184d3ce~mv2.webp)
Wall v. Judicial Committee of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses [2017-2018]
EFC staff are pleased by the Supreme Court decision of May 31, 2018. The case concerns whether the court has the jurisdiction to review the membership decisions of religious communities and other voluntary associations. Randy Wall was a member of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Calgary, Alberta. He was disfellowshipped by the elders of his local congregation. Wall asked the court to undertake a judicial review of the elders’ decision to disfellowship him.
Aug 28, 20172 min read
![Mouvement laïque québécois, et al. v. City of Saguenay, et al., [2015] 2 SCR 3.](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_717d794840b54480ac2405f84a090ed9~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_445,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_717d794840b54480ac2405f84a090ed9~mv2.webp)
![Mouvement laïque québécois, et al. v. City of Saguenay, et al., [2015] 2 SCR 3.](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_717d794840b54480ac2405f84a090ed9~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_306,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_717d794840b54480ac2405f84a090ed9~mv2.webp)
Mouvement laïque québécois, et al. v. City of Saguenay, et al., [2015] 2 SCR 3.
Case Summary A municipal by-law allowed city council meetings in Saguenay to begin with a voluntary prayer for members who wished to participate. Alain Simoneau, a resident of Saguenay at the time, filed a complaint with a human rights tribunal in 2007 over the prayer and the presence of religious symbols, such as a crucifix, at city hall. Simoneau argued that these religious expressions violated his freedom of conscience and religion. The Quebec human rights tribunal found i
Apr 14, 20152 min read
![Loyola High School v. Attorney General of Quebec [2014-2015]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_a4a27ec6574c4404bddf5ac379848f8a~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_443,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_a4a27ec6574c4404bddf5ac379848f8a~mv2.webp)
![Loyola High School v. Attorney General of Quebec [2014-2015]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6ad81f_a4a27ec6574c4404bddf5ac379848f8a~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_305,h_172,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6ad81f_a4a27ec6574c4404bddf5ac379848f8a~mv2.webp)
Loyola High School v. Attorney General of Quebec [2014-2015]
The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada intervened before the Supreme Court of Canada in this religious freedom case March 24, 2014. A decision was announced March 19, 2015. The EFC intervened in the case to argue that government decision making must take into account the principles of life in a free and democratic society, including recognition of the religious freedom of individuals, religious communities and corporations / organizations established for a religious purpose. T
Mar 15, 20153 min read
bottom of page